By Joshua Hall

Many colleges and universities require full-time undergraduate students to purchase a full meal plan as long as they live on-campus. To students this can often feel like they are being exploited, especially given the high average meal cost of university dining plans and the lack of flexibility to scale back from a full buffet experience. Concerns about exploitation in this regard are similar to concerns about about company stores in coal mine towns, where coal miners often were forced to receive a portion of their pay in the form of script that could only be used at the company store. Price Fishback explored the economics of this in his classic article "Did Coal-Miners 'Owe Their Souls to the Company Store'?" (Journal of Economic HIstory, 1986). In that paper he suggests that competition among mines limited monopoly power. He also highlights that many companies owned stores due to the rural nature of the mines and the difficulty of attracting workers to an area where independent stores were unwilling to operate. The same economics seems to apply to meal plan (and dormitory residency requirements) at colleges and universities. The ones that seem to be most stringent in terms of requirements are those that are isolated geographically.

Comments

It is good and smart perspectives in terms of exploitation. But it does not always like that in differ country with differ culture. It does not happen in my country, Indonesia. Most of higher education did not set any requirement or obligation to purchase meal for student.
This such program is not exist in Indonesia higher education.
Thank you.

benny agus setiono · 23 Oct, 2018
Please log in to add a comment.
Authors

Joshua Hall

Metadata

Zenodo.1464390

Published: 9 Oct, 2018

Cc by