[{"id":1189,"title":"Institutional Assimilation","sha":"6897a6ff9dec284d6c78b9e4501ae338","user_id":null,"state":"published","body":"The role of social media companies in content moderation takes center stage in the Section 230 debate. Many conservatives believe that firms like Facebook are mimicking state authority by censoring speech (Frederick,2023).\r\n\r\nWhat if there is merit to this claim? By collaborating with the institutions of governance, private companies become an extension of the government.\r\n\r\nThis phenomenon is known as Institutional Assimilation. Through an organization aligning its conduct with the incentives of the government, it acts as a proxy. Acting as a surrogate for a government agency.\r\n\r\nInstitutional Assimilation subverts the traditional dichotomy of Pluralism and Elite Theory in political science (Gilens \u0026 Page, 2014). The faction within the coalition possessing leverage varies by situation. Regulatory capture (Stigler, 1971)would be an example of the conditions of the Section 230 debate in reverse. Lawmakers acting as stewards of corporate interests, become an extension of the firm.","created_at":"2024-04-01T17:52:02.946Z","updated_at":"2024-05-31T06:00:43.540Z","zenodo_id":11398242,"doi":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11398242","subject":null,"tags":["pressure group theory","political science","governance","institutions","organizations"],"vote_count":0,"view_count":1,"score":0.1,"deleted":false,"muted":false,"tweeted":false,"attachment_file_name":null,"attachment_content_type":null,"attachment_file_size":null,"attachment_updated_at":null}]